Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Back to Mclane.com
McLane Middleton
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
McLane Middleton
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
McLane Middleton
No Result
View All Result

A Cautionary Tale About Statutes of Limitations

Adam Hamel by Adam Hamel
May 5, 2019
in Comments & Insights
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

A case recently heard by the Norfolk County, Massachusetts Superior Court serves as a reminder of the importance of paying attention to statutes of limitation and requirements for service of process, especially in cases involving estates.

Under Massachusetts law, a personal representative does not need to acknowledge any claim by a creditor of the decedent unless, within one year of the date of death, the creditor (1) files a lawsuit on the claim in the appropriate court, and (2) serves the personal representative with process in the suit or files a written notice of the claim with the Register of Probate where the estate is pending. G.L. ch. 190-B, § 3-803.

In this case, Frederick claimed that Carlos and Velia promised that he would be paid a sum of money upon the death of the last of them to die. Carlos died first. After Velia died, Frederick sued Velia’s estate seeking to recover the money he claimed he was owed. The personal representative of Velia’s estate moved to dismiss the complaint as untimely.

Frederick argued that Section 3-803 did not apply to his claim. He said that, because Carlos and Velia promised that he would get the money after they died, his claim was not against them, but against the estate. The court disagreed. Only claims that arise after the decedent’s death—such as claims for expenses incurred by the personal representative in the administration of the estate, or governmental claims for taxes on income received by the estate after the decedent’s death—are excepted from Section 3-803’s one-year statute of limitations. Even though Frederick would not have been able to collect on his claim while Carlos and Velia while they were alive, the claim nevertheless arose during their lifetimes when they made the promise. As a result, Frederick’s claim was a claim against the decedent, and not a claim against the estate. In determining whether the one-year statute of limitations applies, careful consideration should be given to when the claim arose.

Frederick’s case also offers lesson about the importance of satisfying all of the requirements of the statute. Section 3-803 requires that the claimant commence a lawsuit within one year of the decedent’s death. Frederick satisfied this requirement, but just barely—his lawsuit was filed one day before the one-year anniversary of Velia’s death. However, simply filing the lawsuit is not enough. Section 3-803 also requires that service of process, or the filing of a notice of claim in the Probate and Family Court, be made during the one year period. Frederick did not serve his complaint until more than two months later. This was fatal to his claim.

Parties with claims against decedents need to exercise great care in order to make sure that they assert their claims in a timely manner, and that they fully comply with the statutory requirements for filing and service.

Tags: Creditor ClaimsMassachusettsStatutes of Limitations
Adam Hamel

Adam Hamel

More Articles

Court Enforces Accelerated Trust Contest SOL

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

The MA and NH Trust Codes offer trustees important opportunities to reduce the statutes of limitations/repose (SOL) for actions to...

Volpe November 3, 2020 NH Trust Docket Order

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

This order is offered for educational purposes only.  References to law and rules may not be current or accurate.  Counsel...

Contradictions in NH Law: Claims of Deceased Settlor’s Creditors (Links to New Sample Notices)

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

In preparing our NH Deadlines Page, I was struck by the significant inconsistency between our probate statutes and Trust Code...

Notice of Creditor Claim by Trustee Does Not Serve as Notice by Trust Beneficiary

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

In order to preserve the right to bring a creditor claim against a NH estate, a creditor must serve on...

Next Post

Upcoming Trust Litigation Presentation

Looking for more? Visit McLane.com for comprehensive services and information.

Leading Contributors

Adam M. Hamel Director, Litigation Department
Christopher R. Paul Director and Vice Chair, Trusts & Estates Department
Alexandra S. Cote Director, Litigation Department & Chair of the Probate Litigation Group

Stay Connected

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

& Funding Adoption Advice of Counsel Defense Amendment Arbitration Attorney Fees Charitable Trusts Creditor Claims Debts Decanting Divorce Elder Exploitation Elective Share Fiduciary Duty Claims & Defenses Fiduciary Fees Foundations Gifting Guardianship In Terrorem / No Contest Clauses Jurisdiction Massachusetts Medicaid Miscellaneous New Hampshire Partition Popular Culture Power of Attorney Presentations Pretermitted Heirs Professional Ethics Settlements and Releases Slayer Rule Standing Statutes of Limitations Tort Claims Trust Creation Trust Creation, Amendment, & Funding Will & Trust Contests

Categories

  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders
  • Pleadings Bank

Archives

At McLane Middleton, our collaborative team of professionals provides comprehensive legal services.

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 McLane Middleton

No Result
View All Result
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos

© 2025 McLane Middleton