Wednesday, May 21, 2025
Back to Mclane.com
McLane Middleton
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
McLane Middleton
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos
No Result
View All Result
McLane Middleton
No Result
View All Result

NH Supreme Court Confirms Probate Court Jurisdiction

Ralph Holmes (Retired) by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
in Comments & Insights
A A
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

In a case briefed and argued by Alexandra Cote of our office, the NH Supreme Court confirmed the jurisdiction of the Probate Court over real estate titled in the name of a decedent at the time of death, even though the law provides that title passes to heirs or legatees upon death by operation of law.  The decedent died as a domiciliary of Massachusetts and the administrator of her estate (our client) has been engaged in litigation with certain family members in the Massachusetts courts for some time.  With the prospect that the assets subject to administration in Massachusetts are likely insufficient to satisfy administrative expenses, which have priority over bequests, the administrator engaged our office to open ancillary administration in New Hampshire as the decedent’s assets at death included New Hampshire real estate which she had bequeathed in her will to a trust of which her son (“Son”) is the trustee (the “Trustee”).  The Son is an adverse party in the Massachusetts litigation.

We filed a petition for estate administration, providing notice to heirs-at-law, including Son, which was granted without objection.  The Trustee filed an untimely motion for reconsideration and filed a timely appeal, mooting the motion for reconsideration.  On appeal, the Trustee argued that the Probate Court lacked subject matter jurisdiction to conduct an ancillary administration because, inter alia, title to the real estate passed by operation of law at death and in order for the estate to have a claim to the real estate and the Probate Court to have jurisdiction there first needed to be a judicial finding of insolvency by the Massachusetts Probate Court, that is, that the real estate was in fact needed to pay administrative expenses.

In a closely reasoned opinion, the Court (Bassett, J.), rejected the Trustee’s arguments, holding that no such precondition exists.  The Court noted that the Probate Court has relevant jurisdiction to settle real estate title disputes and that an insolvency requirement would make little sense where the Probate Court has the authority to grant an administrator a license to sell real estate regardless of whether an estate is insolvent.  The Court declined to consider the Trustee’s non-jurisdictional arguments as they had not been presented or preserved below.

(Note: Ralph Holmes is currently retired from McLane Middleton. For information on this or other probate litigation issues, please contact Alexandra Cote at alexandra.cote@mclane.com.)

Tags: JurisdictionNew Hampshire
Ralph Holmes (Retired)

Ralph Holmes (Retired)

More Articles

WRIGHT v. McDONALD January 24, 2025 NH Trust Docket Order

by Lexi Cote
February 3, 2025
0

This Order is offered for educational purposes only.  References to law and rules may not be current or accurate.  Counsel...

When in Doubt: A Trial Lawyer’s Call for Caution When it Comes to Remote Signings

by McLane Middleton
January 2, 2024
0

States across the country took steps to permit remote execution of estate planning documents.  In some instances, remote notarization and...

NH Supreme Court Holds Spendthrift Trust Interests Are Not Marital Assets

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

In the Matter of Merrill and Merrill, the NH Supreme Court (Marconi, J.) held that the inclusion by the Family...

Merrill April 20, 2021 NH Supreme Court Opinion

by Ralph Holmes (Retired)
January 2, 2024
0

This order is offered  for educational purposes only. References to law and rules may not be current or accurate.  Counsel...

Next Post

In re Estate of Marie G. Dow January 20, 2021 NH Supreme Court Opinion

Looking for more? Visit McLane.com for comprehensive services and information.

Leading Contributors

Adam M. Hamel Director, Litigation Department
Christopher R. Paul Director and Vice Chair, Trusts & Estates Department
Alexandra S. Cote Director, Litigation Department & Chair of the Probate Litigation Group

Stay Connected

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Tags

& Funding Adoption Advice of Counsel Defense Amendment Arbitration Attorney Fees Charitable Trusts Creditor Claims Debts Decanting Divorce Elder Exploitation Elective Share Fiduciary Duty Claims & Defenses Fiduciary Fees Foundations Gifting Guardianship In Terrorem / No Contest Clauses Jurisdiction Massachusetts Medicaid Miscellaneous New Hampshire Partition Popular Culture Power of Attorney Presentations Pretermitted Heirs Professional Ethics Settlements and Releases Slayer Rule Standing Statutes of Limitations Tort Claims Trust Creation Trust Creation, Amendment, & Funding Will & Trust Contests

Categories

  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders
  • Pleadings Bank

Archives

At McLane Middleton, our collaborative team of professionals provides comprehensive legal services.

  • Disclaimer
  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us

© 2025 McLane Middleton

No Result
View All Result
  • Comments & Insights
  • Law Summaries
  • Orders & Pleadings
  • NH Estate & Trust Deadlines
  • Videos

© 2025 McLane Middleton